VCL-Transfer
Design Patterns for VCL arrangements by the Chair of Business Informatics, especially Information Management at the TU Dresden.
Dimension of the different project phases
Patterns >> Alignment and time cycle of the VCL >> Dimension of the different project phases
Problem | Depending on the learning aims, different dimensions (individual learning vs. group learning, physical vs. virtual space, synchronous vs. Asynchronous communication) are required in different phases of the VCL project. |
---|---|
Framework | solving a case study in virtual environment; international, distributed teams; work in small groups; group processes are a part of the assessment; necessity for transparent communication of the participants |
Solution |
The three dimensions (personal, physical, and time-based dimension) result in eight combinations: The nature of the VCL project, however, further limits the possible combinations.
The dimensions, though limited by the concept of a VCL, still leave some room for the organisers to adapt them to their own needs and learning aims. This could include a preparatory face-to-face phase in a classroom carried out at each partner location or individual learning phases with tasks for each participant independent of a group. Similarly, the groups can be given the opportunity to determine some of the dimensions themselves, such as choosing communication forms, having local meetings of some team members or even assigning individual sub-tasks. The most open dimension is the time-based dimension, allowing the choice between synchronous and asynchronous communication media. This is a key dimension as it can be handled fairly flexibly but can also influence the learning experience. It should be noted that placing limitations on the choice of communication will influence the communication processes within the group and should thus be done with care. The choice of communication includes two points: communication form and space/tool. Prescribing the communication form can strongly effect the groups and should be done with caution and only if there are sound reasons (such as training purpose). The choice of a suitable tool can be either left to the group or prescribed. If work with different communication tools is a part of the learning aims (e.g. getting to know Social Media), then the groups should be left to choose for themselves. If the learning aims are independent of the used tools, the tools can be prescribed for greater efficiency, as the groups then do not have to lose time choosing tools. It should be taken into account when planning the VCL project, that the work in a virtual environment in groups will negatively affect the efficiency of communication, i.e. participants will find that they need to invest more time into the virtual communication than they are used to expect of face-to-face group work. This effect should also be communicated. |
References |
Internationality/geographic distribution of teams |